Fanny, or, More problems with the naughty filter

After our recent troubles with Facebook, our attempt to sign up with Google Books faces this unexpected hurdle:

In a previous editing life, I was once involved in a very, very long discussion with an American author about whether ‘fanny’ was appropriate in the UK edition of his work. In that case, it specifically referred to an older man touching the ‘fanny’ of a young girl. While fully aware of the term’s meaning in the US, we felt it might be rather more ambiguous to UK readers, and might be substituted without changing the meaning or the effect of the text. The author eventually overruled us.

In this case, it seems particularly egregious. What is Google hoping to avoid? Who put ‘fanny’ on the naughty list? And will they accept a tinyurl instead?

(To the last question, at least: Yes.)

Posted October 30, 2008 by James Bridle. Comments (1)
Tags:

1 Comment

  1. That’s astonishing. There are other books with “fanny” in the title (search Amazon for “fanny” and you’ll see). I have successfully submitted both Extraterrestrial Sex Fetish and Necrophilia Variations to Google Books. They filter for “fanny” but not for “necrophilia?”

    # by Supervert, October 30, 2008

RSS Icon RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


ماهواره آنلاین اندروید